Cases 21 - 30 of 166
Price v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv01523
Petitioner:
Ms Selena Rae Price
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Selena Rae Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12129
Plaintiff:
Chanel Taishea Smith
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Shadd v. Saul
as 4:2020cv12095
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shadd
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Asanovsky v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01689
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Alija Asanovsky
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Ryans v. Saul
as 1:2020cv11823
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ryans
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Ambrose v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv04763
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
Tammy Ambrose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Tuttle v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30064
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Tuttle
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Harrison v. Saul
as 1:2020cv10295
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Charles Leon Harrison, Jr.
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Brocklesby v. Saul
as 1:2020cv10113
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
John W Brocklesby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ellis v. SSA, Commissioner of
as 2:2019cv12856
Defendant:
SSA, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
