Cases 1 - 8 of 8
American Drew v. US
as 22-2114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN DREW, AMERICAN OF MARTINSVILLE, BASSETT FURNITURE INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
OEC Freight (NY) Inc. v. Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv09556
Defendant:
Stephen Wolfe, Stanley Furniture Company, Inc. and Stephen E. Wolfe
Plaintiff:
OEC Freight (NY) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad
Clark et al v. Stanley Furniture Company LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00063
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Smith, Doug I. Payne, William G. Perdue and others
Defendant:
Stanley Furniture Company LLC, Supplemental Retirement Plan of Stanley Furniture Company, Inc., Stone & Leigh, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PT TJAKRINDO MAS v. STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY LLC
as 1:2020cv00367
Plaintiff:
PT TJAKRINDO MAS
Defendant:
STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. SMITH
Defendant:
STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. , JOHN D. LAPEY , MICHAEL P. HALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. v. WHALEN FURNITURE MANUFACTURING, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01007
Plaintiff:
STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
WHALEN FURNITURE MANUFACTURING, INC. and COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Wallis v. Levine et al.
as 1:2012cv06466
Defendant:
Childcraft Industries, Inc., Parent Units, RC2 and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Wallis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
