Cases 1 - 10 of 40
ROBINSON v. DCSS et al
as 1:2024cv01217
Plaintiff:
Devin Robinson
Defendant:
STATE OF DE DNB#037802962 and DCSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON v. DCSS et al
as 2:2024cv05572
Defendant:
STATE OF DE DNB#037802962 and DCSS
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
D'Agostino v. EV3, Inc., et al
as 16-1126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D'AGOSTINO
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CA, STATE OF CT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EV3, INC. and MICROTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN CUBELIC, VITAS J. SIPELIS, JOHN HARDIN and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES
Santiago-Aguilera v. State of DE/ Dept of Labor et al
as 1:2015cv01076
Plaintiff:
Jorge Santiago-Aguilera
Defendant:
State of DE/ Dept of Labor, Harleysville Insurance Company and Davis-Young Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harvey v. State of DE Dept. of Health and Social Services et al
as 1:2013cv00959
Plaintiff:
Frances Y. Harvey
Defendant:
State of DE Dept. of Health and Social Services and Goodwill Staffing Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Keith Judd v. Sec of State of DE
as 11-3611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee:
SEC OF STATE OF DE and STATE OF DELAWARE
Wayne Baker v. Donald Flagg, et al
as 11-2190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE T. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD FLAGG, JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPT OF CORR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.