Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 110
State of Washington et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv01979
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01115
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, United States Department of State, Sarah Heidema and others
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, Electronic Frontier Foundation and The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Interested Party: Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
State of Washington et al v. United States of America et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00939
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv03237
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Illinois , State of Maryland and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency and E. Scott Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. James Perry, et al
as 18-15475
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB, CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA and others
Defendant: JAMES R. PERRY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant: AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING, & REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE
UC Regents, et al v. USA, et al
as 18-80037
Plaintiff - Respondent: REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, JANET NAPOLITANO, In her official capacity as President of the University of California, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
State of New York, et al v. FCC, et al
as 18-70692
Petitioner: STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Intervenor - Pending: NCTA-THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, USTELECOM-THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NRDC, et al v. James Perry, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-15380
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., SIERRA CLUB, CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA and others
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES R. PERRY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Intervenor-Defendant: AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING, & REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE
State of California, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al Featured Case
as 18-15255
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant - Appellant: ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor and others
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?