Cases 41 - 50 of 409
Holbrook v. State of Michigan
as 4:2022cv04508
Petitioner:
Charles Holbrook
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Christiansen
as 2:2022cv11700
Petitioner:
Willie Alshauna Lee
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan and John Christiansen
Jean-Pierre Ronet v. Heston Silbert, et al
as 22-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant / Appellee:
HESTON SILBERT, Director, STEPHEN MORRISON, Administrative Service Manager, Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his official and individual capacity, DANIEL KILEY, Judge-Superior Court and others
HOLBROOK v. STATE OF MICHIGAN
as 1:2022cv01293
Petitioner:
CHARLES HOLBROOK
Respondent:
STATE OF MICHIGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2022cv11383
Petitioner:
Floyd A. Lewis
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Frederick Stampone v. Michelle LaJoye-Young, et al
as 22-1464
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHELLE LAJOYE-YOUNG, Sheriff, KENT CIRCUIT JUDGE CURT A. BENSON, CHRISTOPHER R. BECKER, Prosecutor and others
Langford v. Detroit Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv10939
Plaintiff:
Kristiel Langford
Defendant:
Detroit Police Department, City of Detroit, Michigan, State of Michigan and others
Douglas Jackson v. John Davids, et al
as 22-1269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, HEALTH UNIT MANAGER LABARE, RESIDENT UNIT MANAGER OVERSMITH and others
Hill v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv10631
Plaintiff:
Benjamen Hill
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Kyle Echler, Jennifer Hern and others
Artis v Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv10537
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Artis
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, State of Michigan, K. Gaines and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
