Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 74
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01115
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Defendant: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, United States Department of State, Sarah Heidema and others
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, Electronic Frontier Foundation and The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Interested Party: Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
State of Washington et al v. United States of America et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00939
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of New York, et al v. FCC, et al
as 18-70692
Petitioner: STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Intervenor - Pending: NCTA-THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION, USTELECOM-THE BROADBAND ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent: FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Azael Perales v. FBI, et al
as 17-56213
Plaintiff - Appellant: AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Training Academy, National Academy, ALBANY, Counties Covered: Albany, Fulton, Hamilton, Montgomery, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie, Warren, and Washington, ALBUQUERQUE, Counties Covered: Bernalillo, Catron, Cibola (eastern half Guadalupe, Quay, Sandoval, Soccorro, Torrence and Valencia and others
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending: DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending: TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
United States of America et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05389
Defendant: Astellas Pharma, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Impax Laboratories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, John Radice, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. DJO Global Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv07152
Defendant: Biomet, Inc., DJO Finance LLC, DJO Global Inc. and others
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, Russ Milko, Doris Modglin and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Aaron Echols v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2015cv01793
Defendant: Does
Petitioner: Aaron Echols
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2014mc00322
Defendant: Alan Clark Holdings, LLC, FHTM Canada, Inc., FHTM, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Federal Trade Commission, State of Illinois and others
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2014mc00563
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, State of Illinois, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., FHTM, Inc., Alan Clark Holdings, LLC and others
Receiver: Robb Evans & Robb Evans and Associates, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?