Cases 21 - 30 of 46
JONES v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2019cv01504
Defendant:
TERRY KNEPPER, LOIS ALLEN, SCI FAYETTE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PREZIOSI v. NICHOLSON et al
as 2:2019cv01437
Defendant:
MARY ELLEN TORMEY, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, STEPHANIE WOODS and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOSEPH PREZIOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. SCI FAYETTE
as 2:2019cv04724
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JONES
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE, TERRY KNEPPER, LOIS ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAYTON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00822
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. LANE C. DEFRANCISO, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Alexander Welter v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 19-2197
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHANIE WOOD, Health Care Administrator SCI Fayette, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARCY DUDDY, West PA Regional Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER WELTER
WELTER v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00415
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS WELTER
Defendant:
MARCY DUDDY, SCI FAYETTE, JOHN HOCHBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. GILLMORE et al
as 2:2019cv00397
Defendant:
AUSTIN, JOHNSON, CARO and others
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01558
Defendant:
DIRECTOR MS. SMITH, CHCA STEPHANIE WOOD, Mr. HAMMER and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Pollock v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC) et al
as 1:2018cv01731
Plaintiff:
Michael Pollock
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC), Arif Shaikh, M.D., Stephanie Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
