Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gates v. Chase et al
as 3:2018cv00729
Defendant:
Shawna Morson, L Chase and J Kieninger
Plaintiff:
Steven Gates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2017cv01237
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBRA A. HAWKINBERRY, WILLIAM TIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GATES v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv01921
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
STEVEN GATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCAIN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CERSARINO-MARTIN, MAJOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
QADR v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01443
Plaintiff:
NUR QADR
Defendant:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, STEVEN GATES, TAMMY CESERINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WADE v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2014cv01073
Plaintiff:
DETRIUS WADE
Defendant:
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, STEVEN GATES and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATES v. SMITH
as 2:2014cv00245
Petitioner:
STEVEN GATES
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REED v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
LEROY REED
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN COLEMAN, STEVEN GATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Pearson v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 13-1412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUM, DEPT. SUPT. SYLVIA GIBSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
