Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ISAKSEN v. MARINO et al
as 3:2023cv21177
Plaintiff:
ELISA-MARIE ISAKSEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MARINO, PHILLIPSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROSSNAGLE'S SERVICE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steven Siegel v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 19-1746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN SIEGEL
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
SIEGEL v. GIROUX et al
as 1:2015cv00297
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
STEVEN SIEGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franwell, Inc. v. Bio-Tech Medical Software, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv61989
Plaintiff:
Franwell, Inc.
Defendant:
Bio-Tech Medical Software, Inc. , Steven Siegel and Patrick Vo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Franwell, Inc. v. Bio-Tech Medical Software, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv01145
Plaintiff:
Franwell, Inc.
Defendant:
Bio-Tech Medical Software, Inc. , Steven Siegel and Patrick Vo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Welsandt-Burchett v. Haynes/The Dump Furniture Co. et al
as 1:2015cv02421
Plaintiff:
Lori Welsandt-Burchett
Defendant:
Haynes/The Dump Furniture Co., New Venture Holdings, LLC, The Dump Furniture Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siegel v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv50963
Plaintiff:
Steven Siegel
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Siegel v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-50963
Plaintiff:
Steven Siegel
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Feher v. Siegel et al
as 1:2012cv01918
Plaintiff:
Renee Feher
Defendant:
Steven Siegel and Total Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
