Cases 1 - 10 of 559
Stewart v. Coffeewood Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Stewart
Defendant:
Coffeewood Correctional Center and Officer Buach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Angela Dunbar
as 24-6363
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
ANGELA DUNBAR, WARDEN TIMOTHY S. STEWART, MS. STAR and others
King v. Stewart et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Robert Edgar King
Defendant:
Kimberly Stewart, Robert Saliby and D. Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Mark Amonette, MD, Mr. Dillon, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Stewart
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2023cv03559
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Green
Defendant:
Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodwin v. Stirling et al
as 2:2023cv03405
Plaintiff:
Antwon Goodwin
Defendant:
Brian Stirling, Ms. A. Stewart, Mr. Spitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens
as 23-6692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE WARDENS, BEVINS, Lieutenant, CLARK, Sergeant and others
Stewart v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv01725
Petitioner:
Antonio G. Stewart
Respondent:
State of Maryland, Baltimore City Circuit Ct, E.C.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
