Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ronald Bricker v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 10-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, FRED J. RUFFO, WILLIAM AYERS and others
DIGIACOMO v. SUNDAY et al
as 2:2009cv06212
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARSHALL DIGIACOMO
Respondent:
JEFFERY H. SUNDAY, THOMAS E. CHEFFINS, ESTELLE B. RICHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lucas v. Forney et al
as 4:2009cv01619
Petitioner:
Darian Anthony Lucas
Respondent:
Susan J. Forney, PA Attorney General and Patrick S Cawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FELIZ v. UNGER et al
as 2:2009cv00547
Plaintiff:
EDDY FELIZ
Defendant:
SUE ANN UNGER, THOMAS CORBETT, JR., SUSAN J. FORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
John Felgar v. Jeffrey Burkett, et al
as 08-4089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. FELGAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY D. BURKETT, Individually, and as District Attorney at Jefferson County, TONYA S. GEIST, Individually, and as Prothonotary of Jefferson County, LAVIETA LERCH, Sued Individually and others
BOND v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
JESSE DERRICK BOND
Defendant:
THOMAS CORBETT, GREGORY S. SMITH, TRACY A WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FELGAR v. BURKETT et al
as 1:2007cv00268
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. FELGAR
Defendant:
JEFFREY D. BURKETT, TONYA S. GEIST, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. CORBETT et al
as 1:2007cv00135
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ALLEN ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
THOMAS W. CORBETT, SCOTT A. BRADLEY and SUSAN J. FORNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
