Cases 1 - 10 of 98
BALOGH et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv06049
Plaintiff:
CONNIE BALOGH, GEORGE BAUMAN, BRIDGET COLLINS and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Sutter v. UPMC et al
as 2:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Sutter
Defendant:
UPMC, UPMC PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BARNETT v. HENRY et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
JOMO BARNETT
Respondent:
MICHELLE HENRY and SUTTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HARRIS v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN SUTTER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanderson v. Reali et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dwight Sanderson
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Reali, Susan M. Stalnecker, William A. Hawkins, III and others
BARNETT v. SUTTERS
as 1:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
JOMO BARNETT
Respondent:
WARDEN SUTTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litigation
as 23-3089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE PC, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
MERCK & CO INC
In Re: Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litigation, et al
as 23-8046
Petitioner:
MERCK & CO INC
Respondent:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE PC, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D.
HUNTER v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
SEYMOUR SUTTER, LT. VOLZ, WARDEN SUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ARRINGTON v. ERIE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ARRINGTON
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY PRISON, JOSHUA VOGEL, MICHAEL DEJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
