Cases 61 - 70 of 1,214
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Richard J Sullivan, Debra A Livingston, Robert A Katzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SWAIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19384
Plaintiff:
BRETT SWAIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Biggers et al v. Swain et al
as 1:2023cv05893
Plaintiff:
Trenesha Biggers, M.F. and Z.S.
Defendant:
Laura Taylor Swain and Travis Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LTL MANAGEMENT LLC v. EMORY et al
as 3:2023cv03649
Plaintiff:
LTL MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant:
DR. THERESA SWAIN EMORY, DR. RICHARD LAWRENCE KRADIN and DR. JOHN COULTER MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Fontil v. Swain
as 1:2023cv05528
Plaintiff:
Raychel Fontil
Defendant:
Judge Laura Taylor Swain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RODRIGUEZ v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION et al
as 3:2023cv16482
Plaintiff:
DARIO M RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION, BABECOCK, BAGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SWAIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16177
Plaintiff:
GLEN SWAIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lotusflower v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv05558
Plaintiff:
Nonnie Marcella Lotusflower
Defendant:
Charlotte Headley, Alishia McColl, Boschulte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. The State of New York
as 23-936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alfred Joseph
Defendant / Appellee:
The State of New York, Jordan El-Hag, Dennis Fernandez and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
