Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sylvester Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13948
Petitioner / Appellant:
SYLVESTER JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv03546
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JOHNSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00515
Defendant:
BOOTH, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GLENN E YOUNG
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2019cv02297
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Sylvester Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Syl Johnson v. UMG Recordings, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02364
Plaintiff:
Syl Johnson, Sylvester Johnson and Syl Johnson also known as Sylvester Johnson doing business as Twinight Records, Inc.
Defendant:
UMG Recordings, Inc. and Does 1-20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Varnes et al
as 8:2017cv02297
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Johnson
Defendant:
Shannon Varnes, Julie Jones, R. Laubaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 8:2017cv02126
Petitioner:
Sylvester Johnson
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
