Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Vaughan et al v. Wardhaugh et al
as 4:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew V. Vaughan and Amy A. Vaughan
Defendant:
Russell L. Wardhaugh, Amanda N. Wardhaugh, Castlewood Brokers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Eric Sabree, et al
as 22-0111
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC R. SABREE, in his official and personal capacity, WAYNE COUNTY, MI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, also sometimes known as Charter County of Wayne by its Board of Commissioners and OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Respondent:
TONYA BOWLES, for herself and all those similarly situated, BRUCE TAYLOR, for herself and all those similarly situated, BRUCE TAYLOR, for himself and all those similarly situated and others
Elouise Bradley v. Wisconsin Department of Childr, et al
as 21-1251
Defendant / Appellee:
CINDA K. STRICKEN, JENNIFER SABREE, REBECCA MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELOUISE BRADLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00709
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sabree v. Mitchell
as 20-1803
Respondent:
LISA A. MITCHELL, Superintendent, MA Treatment Center
Petitioner:
G. SAIF SABREE
Laura Scott v. Nandan Patel, et al
as 20-1773
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC SABREE, Wayne County Treasurer, CYNTHIA M. YUN, KATHLEEN ANGERER, City Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA MARIE SCOTT
Wilson et al v. Neighborhood Restore Development et al
as 1:2018cv01172
Plaintiff:
Ta'kyashilah Sabree, Wilbert Wilson, E.J. and others
Defendant:
Neighborhood Restore Development and Northeast Brooklyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis et al v. Detroit Downtown Development Authority et al
as 2:2017cv11742
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis and D. Etta Wilcoxon
Defendant:
Detroit Downtown Development Authority , Detroit Brownfield Redevelopment Authority , Mike Duggan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
