Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04626
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McKoy v. Pyramid Commissary
as 1:2026cv02330
Plaintiff:
Samad McKoy
Defendant:
Pyramid Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State Farm File and Casualty Company a/s/o Khaybir Abdus-Samad and Amber N. Richardson v. Galanz Americas Limited Company et al
as 3:2026cv01239
Plaintiff:
State Farm File and Casualty Company a/s/o Khaybir Abdus-Samad and Amber N. Richardson
Defendant:
Galanz Americas Limited Company and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00170
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01189
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BEVANS-SEARLES v. AUMENDO et al
as 1:2026cv02224
Plaintiff:
SAMAD TIMOTHY BEVANS-SEARLES
Defendant:
NICHOLAS AUMENDO, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01119
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BROGDON v. USA
as 2:2026cv01364
Petitioner:
SAMAD BROGDON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
