Cases 1 - 10 of 20
In re: Eddie Hooks
as 22-50087
Petitioner:
In re: Eddie Hooks
Respondent:
Sammy Johnson, Michael Maness and Onshore Quality Control Specialists, L.L.C.
Johnson et al v. Onshore Quality Control Specialists, LLC
as 5:2022mc00100
Plaintiff:
Sammy Johnson and Michael Maness
Defendant:
Onshore Quality Control Specialists, LLC
Petitioner:
Eddie Hooks
Johnson et al v. Onshore Quality Control Specialist, LLC
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sammy Johnson and Michael Maness
Defendant:
Onshore Quality Control Specialist, LLC
Johnson v. Sea Major Seven, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00234
Defendant:
Sea Major Seven, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sammy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Gamble et al
as 2:2016cv00062
Defendant:
Arthur Emling, Mr. Gamble and Brian E. Williams, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Sammy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herman LeFors, Jr. v. Dan Langston, et al
as 15-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Herman H. LeFors, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Dan Langston, Sheriff, Greene County Arkansas, Colin P. Wall, Attorney, Rainwater, Holt and Sexton, PA, Steven M. Blanchard, Dr., Physician for Greene County Jail and others
Johnson et al v. Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas et al
as 4:2015cv01234
Plaintiff:
Sammy Johnson and Lisa Johnson
Defendant:
Metropolitan Lloyds Insurance Company of Texas and Matthew Chisholm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon v. Carter et al
as 3:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Vernon Wesley Dixon
Defendant:
David Carter, Allison Huckabee, Sammie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffins v. Greene County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Huffins
Defendant:
Greene County Jail and Sammy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeFors v. Langston et al
as 3:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Herman H LeFors, Jr
Defendant:
Dan Langston, Colin P Wall, Steven M Blanchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
