Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ortega et al v. Lujan Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ortega and Rebecca Scott
Defendant:
Governor of NM Michelle Lujan Grisham and NM Attorney General Raul Torrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Tapia v. Pinal County Superior Court et al
as 2:2019cv02769
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Pinal County Superior Court
Petitioner:
Samuel Ortega Tapia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Florentina Carreto-Escobar, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71073
Petitioner:
FLORENTINA CARRETO-ESCOBAR, LUCAS MINOR CARRETO-ESCOBAR, GILMER SAMUEL ORTEGA-CARRETO and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Samuel Ortega v. Joe Lizarraga
as 17-71073
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ORTEGA
Respondent:
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden
Samuel Ortega v. USDC-CAOAK
as 16-73909
:
In re: SAMUEL ORTEGA
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ORTEGA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
JOE A. LIZARRAGO
Tapia v. Pinal, County of et al
as 2:2016cv02253
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ortega Tapia
Defendant:
Pinal, County of , Pinal County Adult Detention Center , Pinal County Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ortega v. Lizarrago
as 4:2016cv02747
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ortega
Defendant:
Joe A. Lizarrago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortega-Ruano v. USA
as 2:2013cv00530
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cruz Samuel Ortega-Ruano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ortega v. Kane County Adult Justice Center et al
as 1:2013cv01309
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ortega
Defendant:
Kane County Adult Justice Center and Officer Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
