Cases 31 - 40 of 506
Garcia Sanchez et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 4:2023cv03102
Plaintiff:
Mario Joel Garcia Sanchez, Antonio Beatriz Cortes, Josue Heriberto Rivas Santos and others
Defendant:
USCIS Nebraska Service Center, Ur M. Jaddou and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Goodman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Goodman, Brandon Koenig-Messer, Ryan Loibl and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Sullivan v. Sanchez
as 3:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Sullivan
Defendant:
Jazesmine Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez-Cruz v. Liberty-Ellington
as 4:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cruz Sanchez and Elizabeth Sanchez-Cruz
Defendant:
LynMarie Liberty-Ellington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Cruz v. Barham
as 4:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Cruz Sanchez and Elizabeth Sanchez-Cruz
Defendant:
R Kevin Barham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jose Adame
as 23-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Sanchez Adame
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
