Cases 41 - 50 of 1,078
Sanchez v. Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv01561
Petitioner:
Nakunta Sanchez
Respondent:
Kelly Martinez and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6095
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Sanchez v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jaime Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SANCHEZ-LEYVA v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03606
Petitioner:
GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ-LEYVA
Respondent:
STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacinto Sanchez v. L. Bird
as 23-55562
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACINTO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
L. BIRD
Sanchez v. Barraza et al
as 1:2023cv01010
Petitioner:
Benny Manuel Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden Barraza and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Lilley
as 2:2023cv04568
Petitioner:
Edgar Sanchez
Respondent:
L. Lilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. People of the State of California
as 3:2023cv02920
Petitioner:
Guillermo G. Sanchez
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez Martinez
as 5:2023cv02887
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Sanchez Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rey-Sanchez v. F.J. Garrido
as 4:2023cv00597
Petitioner:
Rafael Rey-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America and F. J. Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
