Cases 71 - 80 of 927
Sanchez v. LaPorte County Indiana et al
as 3:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Mario J Sanchez
Defendant:
LaPorte County Indiana and Thomas J Aleivos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tucker v. Meisner et al
as 2:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Deandre J Tucker
Defendant:
Michael Meisner, Nick Sanchez, Candace Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01984
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re: Tepezza Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2023cv03568
In Re:
TEPEZZA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weibel, Lisa Christian Nethery, Donna Walker and others
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Robinson v. Szul et al
as 1:2023cv03564
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Robinson
Defendant:
Szul, Klikas, Finn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Julio Leija-Sanchez, et al
as 23-1908
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIO LEIJA-SANCHEZ and MANUEL LEIJA-SANCHEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
