Cases 1 - 10 of 53
GIBSON et al v. STROUD et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEON GIBSON and MICHELLE P. GIBSON
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Easley v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sandy Easley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Addington et al v. Southport Marina, Inc.
as 7:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Coleman Shaughnessy, Richard Burke, Deborah Turlington and others
Counter Defendant:
Joseph Griffin, Rodney James Hyson, John Scism and others
Defendant:
Southport Marina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ledbetter v. USA
as 5:2020cv00622
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sandy Darnell Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
OATES v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv00783
Plaintiff:
SANDY JAMES OATES
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACOBS v. USP MCCREARY et al
as 1:2020cv00518
Plaintiff:
CORY LEE JACOBS
Defendant:
USP MCCREARY and USP BIG SANDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Fields v. Gaston County
as 3:2020cv00055
Plaintiff:
Boo Loo Fields, Tony The Tiger Fields, Anubie Anubus Fields and others
Defendant:
Gaston County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
