Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, William Marshall, III, Jeff Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ralph J. Mullins
Defendant:
Cranston D. Johnson, Steve Andryzcik, Edie Viola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ojo v. Sandy et al
as 3:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Adebowale Ojo
Defendant:
Jeff S. Sandy, Betsy Jividen, John Sheeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessup v. Sandy et al
as 1:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Hunter Jessup
Defendant:
Jeff S. Sandy, Betsy Jividen, John Sheeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blue v. Sandy et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mark Blue
Defendant:
Jeff S. Sandy, Betsy Jividen, John Sheeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redden v. Mnuchin et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Dr. David Proctor, Kimberly Paton and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Redden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv00185
Plaintiff:
Roger Reid, Michael Garrett, Abewole Ojo and others
Defendant:
John Doe, 15, John Doe, 10, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanham v. Sandy et al
as 3:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Lanham
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Jeff S. Sandy, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2018cv00193
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Martin, Ms. Sherry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
