Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Robinson v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10698
Plaintiff:
Sara Robinson
Defendant:
Revlon Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2014cv04699
Plaintiff:
Sara Robinson , John Helcl , Richard Lewis and others
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C. and Delphi Automotive PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02510
Defendant:
Delphi Automotive PLC and General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
John Helcl, Richard Lewis, Denise Petersen and others
MERCADO et al v. HALLWORTH et al
as 2:2013cv04747
Plaintiff:
BROOKE MERCADO , BRENDA ASENCIO , SHANNA JEFFCOAT and others
Defendant:
RICHARD HALLWORTH, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., REBECCA PINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Finton et al v. Exxonmobil Pipeline Company et al
as 4:2013cv00381
Plaintiff:
James P Finton, Jr , Donna Delane Finton , James Adams, Sr and others
Defendant:
Exxonmobil Pipeline Company , Mobil Pipe Line Company , Exxon Mobil Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Mari Robinson v. Michael Astrue
as 11-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARI ROBINSON, on behalf of Sara Robinson, Rebecca Robinson, Elizabeth Robinson, and on behalf of Scott Schramm
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Mari Robinson v. Michael Astrue
as 11-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARI ROBINSON, on behalf of Sara Robinson, Rebecca Robinson, Elizabeth Robinson, and on behalf of Scott Schramm
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Robinson v. Rodman et al
as 2:2007cv01552
Plaintiff:
Sara Robinson and Sara Robinson
Defendant:
Dennis Rodman, Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC and Hard Rock Hotel, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
