Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Nathaniel Williams v. Yes Care Corp.
as 24-6333
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
YES CARE CORP., SARAH JOHNSON, RN, DR. CLEM, M.D. and others
Woods v. ECI - East and Medical Department, et al
as 1:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Lorne Woods
Defendant:
ECI - East and Medical Department, R.N. Sarah Johnson, Dr. Raab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yes Care Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathaniel Williams
Defendant:
ECI Health Department, RN Sarah Jhonson, NP Stephanie Cyran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Clayton et al
as 1:2021cv01062
Defendant:
CO II Adrian Christopher, Warden Walter West, Lt. William Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Diana Cantu-Guerrero v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 20-2036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KERRY CONSTATINE, BEATRICE BELL, CARINNE D. KARLICK and others
Appellant:
DIANA CANTU-GUERRERO
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Collins Grading Inc v. Southeast Heavy Equipment Inc et al
as 7:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
Collins Grading Inc
Defendant:
Southeast Heavy Equipment Inc and Sarah Johnson-Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC.
as 1:2015cv02648
Plaintiff:
Stephen Johnson and Sarah Johnson
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson et al v. I-Flow, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Sarah Johnson , Patricia Johnson and Brian Johnson
Defendant:
I-Flow, LLC , Kimberly-Clark Healthcare Company, Inc. , Philip S. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
