Cases 71 - 80 of 277
Johnson et al v. B.C. Goodwin Transportation, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00202
Plaintiff:
Faith Colbert and Sarah Johnson
Defendant:
B.C. Goodwin Transportation, LLC and Andrew Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arrington v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2019cv03058
Defendant:
Brandon Shrader, GTL Lexis Advice, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Clarence Arrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Wexford Medical Source et al
as 3:2019cv00222
Defendant:
C/O Korte, Sgt. Migneren, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Evans v. Carlock, et al.
as 2:2019cv00110
Defendant:
John F. Schuck, Judge Jeffery Tauber, Stephen Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugan v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv00234
Defendant:
First Name Unknown ("FNU") Clemmens, (FNU) Wilcox, (FNU) Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Dugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sustaita v. Bednardz et al
as 4:2018cv04236
Defendant:
K Overton, John Doe, Bednardz and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sustaita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Brooks et al
as 1:2018cv07772
Defendant:
Dominguez, Sherman, Avila and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Finance of America Reverse, LLC
as 1:2018cv00976
Counter Plaintiff:
FINANCE OF AMERICA REVERSE, LLC
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF SARAH JOHNSON, Bradley Johnson and The Estate of Sarah L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dyjak v. Piephoff et al
as 3:2018cv02049
Defendant:
Tonya Piephoff, Dr. Gavali, Sarah Brown-Foiles and others
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2018cv03270
Defendant:
Anthony E Sullivan, Kess Roberson, Daniel E Shreve and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
