Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SLOAN v. MERCK & CO INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05153
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO INC.
Plaintiff:
SARAH SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sloan v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv15787
Plaintiff:
Sarah Sloan
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ken Saclo et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv04751
Plaintiff:
Ken Saclo , Mel Cohen , Tiffany Malone and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Ken Saclo et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as CAC/8:14-cv-00604
Plaintiff:
Ken Saclo , Mel Cohen , Tiffany Malone and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc.
Ken Saclo et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clinton, Mel Cohen, Bonnie Condon and others
Defendant:
Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc. and General Motors, LLC
Sloan v. NC Division of Motor Vehicles et al
as 2:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Sarah Sloan
Defendant:
NC Division of Motor Vehicles , M. A. Duckett and Kathy Brannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BECKER, et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al
as 1:2001cv00811
Plaintiff:
SEEDS OF PEACE, INC. , ELIZABETH T. BUTLER , KIMBERLY GRIER and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT , CHARLES H. RAMSEY , TERRANCE W. GAINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caneisha Mills, et al v. DC
as 08-7127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Caneisha Mills, William Robinson, Linda Leaks and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
MILLS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2008cv01061
Plaintiff:
CANEISHA MILLS, CANEISHA MILLS, WILLIAM ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
