Cases 1 - 6 of 6
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC et al v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC and Dr. BEVERLY GRAY, MD
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, TODD M. WILLIAMS, JIM O'NEILL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
JOSHUA STEIN, SATANA DEBERRY, AVERY MICHELLE CRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandon Bernard v. T. J. Watson
as 20-3379
Respondent / Appellee:
T. J. WATSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON BERNARD
Amicus Curiae:
CHESA BOUDIN, JODY OWENS, MICHAEL DOUGHERTY and others
Antoine Martin v. Roy Cooper
as 19-2196
Defendant / Appellee:
HERTFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, LT. MARTY DAVIS, Major, VERNON STEWART, District Attorney (District 11A) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTOINE D. MARTIN
Amy Bryant v. Jim Woodall
as 19-1685
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMY BRYANT, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, ELIZABETH DEANS, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, BEVERLY GRAY, M.D., On behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JIM WOODALL, In his official capacity as District Attorney ("DA") for Prosecutorial District ("PD") 15B, ELEANOR E. GREENE, In her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board, MANDY K. COHEN, In her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services; and their employees, agents, and successors and others
Martin v. Cooper et al
as 2:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Seth Edwards, Spencer Merriweather, Mike Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
