Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04809
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04185
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv09370
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
as 26-6792
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, SOPHIA FEASTER, CHARLIE LOCKLEAR and others
Lu v. Venturella et al
as 6:2026cv03424
Petitioner:
YANQIU Lu
Respondent:
Director David Venturella, Markwayne Mullin, Shelia Sauls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VanderWoude v. United States of America
as 7:2026cv00290
Plaintiff:
Saul Israel VanderWoude
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
BUNCH et al v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2026cv00164
Plaintiff:
DURWARD BUNCH, JR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, REBECCA MORRIS, LLOYD ARNOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04418
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03944
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Belue v. McDaniel et al
as 9:2026cv02833
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Belue
Defendant:
Erick McDaniel, Jordan Sauls and P. Gagum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
