Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Rodriguez et al v. Allstate Texas Lloyd's et al
as 4:2019cv04864
Plaintiff:
Angela Rodriguez and Saul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Mark Chrisinske and Allstate Texas Lloyd's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bobbitt et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11886
Plaintiff:
Richard Solomon, Joseph Scattareggia, Kevin Skinner and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Rodriguez v. Hibachi Express et al
as 6:2018cv01911
Defendant:
Jing S Xie and Hibachi Express
Plaintiff:
Saul Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez et al v. Garcia
as 4:2017cv03366
Plaintiff:
Hector Saul Rodriguez and Josefina Rodriguez-Aguilar
Defendant:
Janet Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00612
Plaintiff:
Joella Christine Rodriguez and Saul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saul Rodriguez-Esquer v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72486
Petitioner:
SAUL RODRIGUEZ-ESQUER, AKA Luis Alvarez-Cruz, AKA Saul Rodriguez, AKA Saul Rodriguezesquer
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Garza et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02579
Plaintiff:
Nancy Garza and Saul Rodriguez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saul Rodriguez Solis, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70051
Petitioner:
SAUL RODRIGUEZ SOLIS, MARIA HILDA RODRIGUEZ and JESSICA JAZMIN RODRIGUEZ PICASSO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Saul Carlos v. Leland McEwen
as 12-56684
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAUL RODRIGUEZ CARLOS
Respondent - Appellee:
LELAND MCEWEN
Harris v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv00835
Plaintiff:
Garcia Jerry Harris
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Tyron Jackson, Judith Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
