Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Savidge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06009
Plaintiff:
Matthew Clark Savidge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sherbert et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv04191
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Sherbert, Jerry Wayne Morris, Albert Mount and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 22-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. EBBERT, IAN CONNERS, J. RAY ORMOND and others
SAVIDGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE SAVIDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SAVIDGE v. CLINTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2021cv16707
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SAVIDGE
Defendant:
CLINTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, CLINTON TOWNSHIP MIDDLE SCHOOL and John Gerald Sirotnak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SAVIDGE v. CLINTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2021cv16707
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SAVIDGE
Defendant:
CLINTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, CLINTON TOWNSHIP MIDDLE SCHOOL, JOHN GERALD SIROTNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Landis v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2021cv00244
Defendant:
M. Condit, J. Konkle, J. Sienkiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 20-3276
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. ROY ORMAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STEESE and others
SAVIDGE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97062
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG SAVIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
