Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Saylor v. Cargor
as 2:2023cv13072
Petitioner:
Brian Neil Saylor
Respondent:
Warden Cargor, Cargor and Kim Cargor
Davis #200318 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Davis #200318
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, L. Parish, Thomas Mackie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reinig et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10663
Plaintiff:
Tina Reinig, Gloria Grover, Mary May and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Davis #200318 v. Mackie et al
as 1:2019cv00469
Defendant:
A. Haskey, W. Janicki, Unknown Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Davis #200318
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellis vs. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11289
Plaintiff:
McFadden Bellis , M C.1. , Eyondra McFadden and others
Petitioner:
Arnett Rison, III and A.1 R.IV.
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marden v. Midland, County of et al
as 1:2015cv14504
Plaintiff:
Sharyl Marden
Defendant:
Midland, County of , Jeffery Derocher , Brian Keidel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bi-State Compact Commission, Illinois/Michigan et al
as 2:2015cv14026
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Bi-State Compact Commission, Illinois/Michigan, Interstate Commission on Adult Offenders Supervision, Hagerman and others
Zynda et al v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2015cv11449
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Zynda , Amanda Balma , Kevin Grifka and others
Defendant:
Michael Zimmer and Sharon Moffett-Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States for the Use and Benefit of Curtis Glass Company v. Saylor Construction et al
as 2:2014cv13329
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of Curtis Glass Company
Defendant:
Saylor Construction and Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
