Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borsuk, Jill v. Todd, Chuck et al
as 3:2023cv00858
Plaintiff:
Jill L. Borsuk
Defendant:
Chuck Todd, Joe Scarborough, Mika Brezinski Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scarborough, Jr. v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00470
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Scarborough, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MILLER v. MILLER et al
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
RICHARD L. MILLER, KAREN CALDEMEYER, CLESTA SCARBOROUGH and others
Plaintiff:
LISA A. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wand, Armin et al v. Wisconsin Secure Program Facility et al
as 3:2018cv00500
Defendant:
John E. Scarborough, MD, Becky Kramer, Wisconsin Secure Program Facility and others
Undetermined:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Armin Wand, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarborough v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00986
Plaintiff:
Virgina Scarborough
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Scarborough v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv11594
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Scarborough
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cody v. The Nielsen Company (US) LLC et al
as 1:2014cv05252
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
The Nielsen Company (US) LLC , Nielsen Audio, Inc. and Scarborough Research
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scarborough v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv11644
Plaintiff:
Sharlyn Scarborough
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDRES et al v. MIDWEST HVAC, INC.
as 4:2007cv00098
Plaintiff:
MARLIN ANDRES, DARREL SCARBOROUGH, ROGER J. BAUM, SR. and others
Defendant:
MIDWEST HVAC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
