Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HENRY v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2022cv05802
Plaintiff:
JAMAL M. HENRY
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. REYNOLDS, SHELBY SCHEFFLER and RIZWAN BAKHAT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHEFFLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv12046
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
LINDA SCHEFFLER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. f/k/a JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHEFFLER v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
as 2:2020cv02056
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SCHEFFLER
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SCHEFFLER v. TD BANK N.A.
as 1:2018cv06688
Plaintiff:
NICOLE F SCHEFFLER
Defendant:
TD BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SCHEFFLER v. HARRY et al
as 5:2018cv00610
Petitioner:
JOHN SCHEFFLER
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eric Rambert v. Jamie Ferkdarko, et al
as 16-4275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE FERKDARKO, RNS, LISA ZUPSIC, ND.C, GARY PRINKEY, RNS and others
REED v. SCHEFFLER et al
as 1:2016cv00423
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. REED, JR.
Defendant:
KAREN SCHEFFLER, TRACY KILMER and BOROUGH OF PALMYRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler et al v. Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02464
Plaintiff:
Kalawatti Kay Scheffler and James E. Scheffler
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. , DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC. , Forest Laboratories, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
