Cases 71 - 80 of 249
Randolph Morton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2018cv05956
Defendant:
Schneider Electric USA Inc, Union Carbide Corporation, -, CBS Corporation (f/k/a VIACOM, INC., successor by merger with CBS CORPORATION f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to BF STURTEVANT) and others
Plaintiff:
Edna S. Morton and Randolph Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv01842
Plaintiff:
Paul E Cruise and Mary Ann Robertson
Defendant:
Armstrong International Inc, Schneider Electric USA Inc, Occidental Chemical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Betzner et al v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 3:2018cv01294
Plaintiff:
Bruce Betzner and Barbara Betzner
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Brian Houghton v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv03133
Plaintiff:
Brian Houghton, Stanley Houghton, Susan Effinger and others
Defendant:
SYD Carpenter, Marine Contractor, Inc., Hennessy Industries, Inc., Eaton Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Stephen N Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Ayotte v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2018cv02662
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, H.B. Fuller Company and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Ayotte
Cross_claimant:
The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company , The Toro Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Daniel L Ayotte , United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Industrial Holdings Corporation , MTD Products, Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
United Technologies Corporation-Pratt & Whitney Division, Dana Companies, LLC , Carlisle Industrial Brake & Friction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flowers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
Janis Flowers , James Flowers and Gerald Flowers, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Aurora Pump Company , Honeywell International, Inc. , Dap Products Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Aurora Pump Company , 3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams et al v. 3M Company F/K/A Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company et al
as 4:2017cv03755
Plaintiff:
John H Adams and Lorraine Adams
Defendant:
3M Company F/K/A Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company , Appleton Grp LLC , The Boeing Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Certainteed Corporation and Eaton Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Certainteed Corporation , 3M Company F/K/A Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company , Appleton Grp LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Stuart et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
Samuel Price Stuart and Anita Louise Stuart
Defendant:
ABB Inc , American Electric Power Company Inc, Autozone Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MURPHY et al v. FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv03910
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURPHY and LORRAINE MURPHY
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION , ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, BLACKMER PUMP CO. and others
Cross_claimant:
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and SIEMENS ENERGY & AUTOMATION, INC.
Cross_defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION , 3-M COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MURPHY et al v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED et al
as 2:2017cv03898
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURPHY and LORRAINE MURPHY
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED , BLACKER PUMP CO. , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
3-M COMPANY , CRANE CO. , ROCKWELL AUTOMATION and others
Cross_defendant:
3-M COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
