Cases 1 - 10 of 288
Quezergue v. Gunn et al
as 3:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kenzo Quezergue
Defendant:
Bret T. Gunn, Judge Cheryl Blackburn, Victor S. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Rebecca Hunter, Tennessee Department of Human Resources, Debbie Inglis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv00540
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Bill Haslam, Aramark Indestry Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv01296
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Bill Haslam, Aramark Indestry Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGrone v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00395
Plaintiff:
Frankln Delano McGrone
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Bobby Peacock, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crippen v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2017cv01181
Plaintiff:
Eddie Crippen
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, David Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
James T Pierce
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Kevin Hampton and Todd Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angus v. TDOC et al
as 1:2016cv00377
Plaintiff:
Joe H Angus
Defendant:
TDOC, Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv02060
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen
Defendant:
f/n/u Schofield, Jewel Steele, State of Tennessee et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Doyle et al
as 2:2016cv02577
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Bailey
Defendant:
Ashley Doyle, Jacqueline McDougle, Jeff Gatlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
