Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Schutte, Robyn v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Robyn Schutte
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MARBURGER v. PCI et al
as 1:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MARBURGER
Defendant:
PCI and ERIC SCHUTTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Donna Schutte v. Ciox Health, LLC, et al
as 22-1087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA SCHUTTE
Defendant / Appellee:
CIOX HEALTH, LLC and PROHEALTH CARE, INC.
Donna Schutte v. Ciox Health, LLC, et al
as 21-3299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNA SCHUTTE
Defendant / Appellee:
CIOX HEALTH, LLC and PROHEALTH CARE, INC.
Donna Schutte v. Ciox Health, LLC, et al
as 21-8036
Petitioner:
DONNA SCHUTTE
Respondent:
CIOX HEALTH, LLC and PROHEALTH CARE, INC.
Apalone Inc. v. Schutt Sports LLC et al
as 3:2021cv03186
Plaintiff:
Apalone, Inc. and Apalone Inc.
Defendant:
Schutt Sports, LLC, Certor Sports, LLC, Schutt Sports LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Schutte, Robyn v. Saul, Andrew
as 3:2021cv00122
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Robyn Schutte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Schutte v. Ciox Health LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Ciox Health LLC and ProHealth Care Inc
Plaintiff:
Donna Schutte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Yarberry, et al v. Supervalu Incorporated, et al
as 20-2241
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERVALU INCORPORATED, SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE CORPORATION, FOODARAMA, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Appellant:
TRACY SCHUTTE, Relator and MICHAEL YARBERRY, Relator
Amicus Curiae:
TAXPAYERS AGAINST FRAUD EDUCATION FUND, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INCORPORATED and others
DeCap v. Schutte et al
as 4:2019cv04258
Defendant:
Clinton Powles and Mathew P Schutte
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael DeCap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
