Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Barajas v. Saline County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Barajas
Defendant:
Saline County, Arkansas, Hunter Thompson, Sullivan Sulzberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barajas v. Thompson et al
as 4:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Barajas
Defendant:
Hunter Thompson, Sullivan Sulzberger, Christy Biddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Scoggins
as 4:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Reginald D Robinson
Defendant:
James Scoggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Carter v. Minors et al
as 4:2023cv04001
Plaintiff:
Dillon Carl Carter
Defendant:
Warden John Minors, Assistant Warden Shaunda Scoggins, Security Major Vickey Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Arkansas State Hospital et al
as 4:2021cv00865
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dean Robinson
Defendant:
Arkansas State Hospital, Keith Scoggins, Steven Domon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scoggins v. Intuitive Surgical Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00730
Plaintiff:
Gloria Gallien Scoggins
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Felt et al
as 4:2021cv04028
Plaintiff:
Melton Lee Miller
Defendant:
Jazzmon N Trice, John Felt and Meldin G Scoggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Felt et al
as 4:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Melton Lee Miller
Defendant:
Jazzmon N Trice, John Felt and Meldin G Scoggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scoggins v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Mary H Scoggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Palmer v. Franklin et al
as 4:2018cv04140
Defendant:
John Doe Administrator, Rodderick Dunn, Mrs. Scoggins and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
