Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SCOTLAND v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00831
Plaintiff:
CHAD ALLEN SCOTLAND
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scotland v. Hospira, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv17474
Plaintiff:
Keirsten Scotland
Defendant:
Hospira, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC f/k/a Hospira Worldwide, Inc., Sandoz, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Martinez et al v. Deutsche Bank AG et al
as 3:2016cv01207
Plaintiff:
Saul Martinez , Sarah Martinez , Samantha Gage and others
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank AG, HSBC Holdings PLC, HSBC Bank PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Covington v. Scotland Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 9:2016cv02498
Plaintiff:
Demario Covington
Defendant:
Scotland Memorial Hospital, Inc. and Scotland Health Care System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scotland v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv31274
Plaintiff:
Elinor Scotland
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scotland v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv28159
Plaintiff:
Tara Scotland
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Makula v. National Theatre of Scotland
as 1:2013cv01888
Plaintiff:
Jason Makula
Defendant:
National Theatre of Scotland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Gill v. Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC et al
as 3:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Mati Gill
Defendant:
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and Royal Bank of Scotland, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRAY v. MULGREW et al
as 1:2008cv01541
Plaintiff:
LAURA MURRAY
Defendant:
GARY MULGREW and THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Romero et al v. Scotland Oil Company et al
as 2:2008cv00154
Plaintiff:
Pedro Romero, Pedro Romero, Maria Carmen Romero and others
Defendant:
Scotland Oil Company and Ron M Brennan
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
