Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Casey Tyler v. Scotland Correctional Institution
as 21-7682
Petitioner / Appellant:
CASEY RAFAEL TYLER
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Tyler v. Scotland Correctional Institution
as 5:2021ct03068
Respondent:
Scotland Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Casey Rafael Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tyler v. Scotland Correctional Institution
as 5:2021hc02056
Respondent:
Scotland Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Casey Rafael Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAZOR v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2020cv00956
Defendant:
YOLANDA COVINGTON, SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and KATIE POOLE
Plaintiff:
PERNELL RAZOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Razor v. Scotland Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2020ct03314
Defendant:
Yolanda Covington, Scotland Correctional Institution and Katie Poole
Plaintiff:
Pernell Razor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDIN v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2019cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. HENDERSON
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SYMMES v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY-PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00024
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY-PRISONS and SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS R. SYMMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JONES
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
