Cases 91 - 100 of 220
NELSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. NELSON
Defendant:
TYRONE WILLIAMS, EDWARD F. RIELLY, ISACC FULWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Rodarmel et al
as 3:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Matt Rodarmel, Tyrone Wallace, E Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Derrick Brown v. Warden B.A. Bledsoe, et al
as 10-1235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
B. A. BLEDSOE, MAIORANA, REAR and others
ANAMANYA v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv00113
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ANAMANYA
Defendant:
HARELY G. LAPPIN, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, J. L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold Reeves v. Harley Lapin, et al
as 10-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD REEVES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPIN, Director of B.O.P., D. SCOTT DODRILL, Northeast Regional Director, J. GRONDOLSKY, Warden and others
Clark v. Fleming et al
as 3:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Clark
Defendant:
J. Fleming, Kulago, Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hicks v. Yost, et al
as 10-1033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN YOST, Warden, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Cent. Office Director and SCOTT DODRIL, Reg. Director
Brown v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2009cv02563
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brown
Defendant:
B. A. Bledsoe, C. Maiorana, K. Rear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Buculei v. United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv40215
Plaintiff:
Catalin Livio Buculei
Defendant:
United States of America, D. Scott Dodrill, J.L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wynn v. Dodrill
as 4:2009cv02888
Petitioner:
Mack Wynn
Respondent:
D. Scott Dodrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
