Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Childs v. City of Denham Springs et al
as 3:2012cv00795
Plaintiff:
Sarah Childs
Defendant:
City of Denham Springs, John Doe, Jimmy Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Genworth Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. Jones et al
as 3:2011cv00594
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life & Annuity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kenneth Wayne Jones, Jr. , Denise Catherine Ashburn, Lisa L. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nisiewicz et al v. Lovett et al
as 3:2011cv00159
Defendant:
City of Denham Springs, Denham Springs Police Department, Scott Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Alisha A. Nisiewicz and Jason Nisiewicz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Phil-Mar Enterprises of Texas, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2010cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Jones
Defendant:
Phil-Mar Enterprises of Texas, L.L.C. and H.D.C. Ag, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Progressive Security Insurance Co v. Monaco Coach Corp
as 5:2008cv01594
Plaintiff:
Progressive Security Insurance Co and Scott Jones
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corp and Buddy Gregg Motor Homes Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones v. Allison
as 1:2008cv00259
Plaintiff:
Devin Scott Jones
Defendant:
David Allison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv04314
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Jones
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mortgage Clearing Corporation
as 2:2007cv01091
Plaintiff:
Mortgage Clearing Corporation, Mortgage Clearing Corporation, Mortgage Clearing Corporation and others
Defendant:
Vanessa Mary Jones, Audrey Scott Jones and Henderson Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
