Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
VAUGHN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00960
Plaintiff: SCOTT M. VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant: LAWRENCE DAVIS and AMBER NORROD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Gladieux et al
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff: Scott M Martin
Defendant: Gladieux, Kock and QCC nursing staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff: Scott M Martin
Defendant: Gladieux, Kock and QCC nursing staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mussman v. D.A. Dodd Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff: Rhys Mussman
Defendant: D.A. Dodd Inc., Scott M. Keller, Natasha A. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
AFANADOR v. COUNTY OF LAWRENCE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00092
Defendant: COUNTY OF LAWRENCE
Plaintiff: SCOTT M AFANADOR and SCOTT M. AFANADOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AFANADOR v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 4:2020cv00213
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner: SCOTT M. AFANADOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nairamat Investments, LLC v. Wise et al
as 1:2018cv00391
Defendant: Berekk A. Blackwell, Scotty's Holdings, LLC, PRP Scotty's Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Nairamat Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02909
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CURRY v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02775
Plaintiff: SCOTT M CURRY and SCOTT M. CURRY
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
VAUGHN v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02082
Miscellaneou: PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner: SCOTT M VAUGHN, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?