Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Georges et al v. Detroit Pizza NYC LLC et al
as 1:2023cv11164
Plaintiff:
Marvin Georges and Jerel Pool
Defendant:
Detroit Pizza NYC LLC, Detroit Pizza Ventures LLC, Detroit Pizza LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fl Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stevens v. Carter et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Scott Stevens and Linzay Leroy Stevens
Defendant:
Christopher Carter, Onaja Abdullah Cooper and Ezekiel Nathaniel Casas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy StevensIn re: Randy Stevens
as 23-1307
Petitioner:
In re: RANDY SCOTT STEVENS
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON
Stevens v. Morrison
as 2:2023cv10290
Petitioner:
Randy Scott Steven and Randy Scott Stevens
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv12789
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCOTT STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEFTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02974
Plaintiff:
SCOTT STEVEN SHEFTZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGriff Insurance Services, Inc. v. Stevens
as 4:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
McGriff Insurance Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61374
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv96283
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN SCOTT STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
