Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Seader v. Storey, et al
as 13-1295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON SEADER
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT STOREY, THOMAS JACKSON and AMY RUPPECK, ;JOHN DOE; JANE DOE
Seader v. Storey et al
as 1:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Jason Seader
Defendant:
Scott Storey, Thomas M. Jackson and Amy Ruppeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEVENEY v. STOREY et al
as 2:2010cv00356
Plaintiff:
WADE CHARLES DEVENEY
Defendant:
SCOTT STOREY and MARK WESTROM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS et al v. LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC. et al
as 7:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JENKINS and CAROLINE J. BARNES
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC., JOHN DOE I, CORBIN NEELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fleury v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2010cv01423
Plaintiff:
Justin Thomas Fleury
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Farris, Ted Mink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS et al v. LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00366
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JENKINS and CAROLINE J. BARNES
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC., JOHN DOE I, CORBIN NEELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hofland v. Ross, et al
as 09-2219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL B. HOFLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN ROSS, Penobscot County Sheriff and SCOTT STOREY, Waldo County Sheriff
HOFLAND v. STOREY et al
as 2:2009cv00343
Petitioner:
RANDALL B HOFLAND
Respondent:
SCOTT STOREY and MAURICE OUELLETTE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HOFLAND v. ROSS et al
as 1:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
RANDALL B HOFLAND
Defendant:
GLENN ROSS and SCOTT STOREY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDaniel v. Suthers, et al
as 08-1400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN SUTHERS, Colorado Attorney General (official capacity) and SCOTT STOREY, Jefferson County District Attorney (official capacity)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
