Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BROWN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv08775
Plaintiff:
HOWARD D BROWN , WENDY BROWN , KRISTI BROWN GAMBRELL and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER , INC. and IMERYS TAC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 3:2016cv02436
Plaintiff:
William A. Himchak, III
Defendant:
Daniel Dye, CMNWLTH Of Pa - Pa State Police, Craig Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Himchak, III v. Daniel Dye, et al
as 16-3654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III, Navy Veteran
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL DYE, Deputy Atty. General, Comn of PA - Office Atty. General, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, CRAIG BOWMAN, LT. Current Station CMDR - FMR. Internal Affairs Dept. and others
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 1:2014cv02394
Plaintiff:
William A. Himchak, III
Defendant:
Daniel Dye, CMNWLTH Of Pa - Pa State Police, Craig Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 2:2014cv07024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Defendant:
DANIEL DYE, CMNWLTH OF PA - PA STATE POLICE, CRAIG BOWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Herman et al
as 1:2013cv01426
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas Manning
Defendant:
Douglas Herman, Thomas Corbett, Richard Alloway, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADY v. ATLANTIC COUNTY WELFARE et al
as 1:2008cv02856
Plaintiff:
SCOTT THOMAS BRADY
Defendant:
ATLANTIC COUNTY WELFARE, ATLANTIC CITY, NJ, CASE WORKER MIA MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THOMAS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEP'T OF CORR. et al
as 3:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCOTT THOMAS and CHARLES SCOTT THOMAS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEP'T OF CORR., CUTSHALL, OFFICER EVERHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
