Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Veale, et al v. Washington, NH, et al
as 12-1866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. VEALE and SCOTT W. VEALE
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON, NH, WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, FNU MARSHALL and others
Veale, et al v. Furness, et al
as 12-1439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. VEALE, agent for deceased canine Elsie Veale and SCOTT W. VEALE, agent for deceased canine Elsie Veale
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT T. FURNESS, Dr., DVM, APPLE TREE ANIMAL HOSPITAL, TUFTS UNIVERSITY and others
Veale et al v. Washington, Town of et al
as 1:2011fp00582
Defendant:
Board of Selectmen for Town of Washington (2008-2009), FNU Marshall, Other Known and Unknown Defendants and others
Plaintiff:
David T. Veale and Scott W. Veale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Veale, et al
as 11-1710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. VEALE and SCOTT W. VEALE
Plaintiff:
THEODORE R. VEALE and DOROTHY J. VEALE
:
Veale et al v. United States of America
as 1:2011mc00045
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Veale and David T. Veale
Defendant:
United States of America
Veale et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010mc00043
Plaintiff:
David T. Veale, Scott W Veale, Dorothy J. Veale and others
Defendant:
United States of America and State of New Hampshire
Veale v. State of New Hampshire
as 10-1896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David T. Veale and Scott W. Veale
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New Hampshire, Peter McDonough, Hillsborough County Attorney's Office, John Coughlin, Hillsborough County Attorney's Office and others
Veale et al v. Furness et al
as 1:2010cv00147
Defendant:
FNU Angel, Angell Animal Medical Center, Animal Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
David T. Veale and Scott W. Veale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
VEALE MASTER FILE, et al v. ALL DEFENDANTS, et al
as 1:2002mc00011
Defendant:
All Defendants
Plaintiff:
David T. Veale and Scott W. Veale
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
