Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LonTex14 LLC et al v. VetCor Franchising LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
LonTex14 LLC and Blaine Decker
Defendant:
VetCor Franchising LLC, Paul Huszar, Mike Long and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Walden et al v. Shire et al
as 1:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Antonina Walden and Scott Walden
Defendant:
Hashi Shire, AJ Logistics, LLC and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WALDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57758
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SCOTT WALDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Howell et al
as 1:2019cv00288
Defendant:
Stephen Billy, Scott Walden, Paige Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Lamar Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Walden et al
as 1:2015cv00537
Plaintiff:
Barry Searcy
Defendant:
Scott Walden, Jennifer Pantner, Does 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tims v. Golden et al
as 1:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Tims
Defendant:
Shaun Golden, Scott Walden, Ray Rolin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Patterson et al v. Walden et al
as 1:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Betty Patterson and DeWayne Russell
Defendant:
Scott Walden , Jason Dean , City of Atmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emeka v. Farha et al
as 3:2011cv03166
Plaintiff:
Nnabuife Emeka
Defendant:
Gary Farha, Jon Barnard and Scott . Walden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Thomas et al
as 1:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Barry Searcy
Defendant:
Martin Thomas, Kelly Brown, Terry Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Carter v. Patricia Carter, et al
as 10-1145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA B. CARTER, PAMELA SCHWARTZ, GERALD TIMMERWILKE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
