Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Kenneth Turmon v. Scotty Bodiford
as 26-6798
Petitioner: KENNETH EUGENE TURMON, a/k/a Kenneth Eugene Turmon, Jr.
Respondent: SCOTTY BODIFORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04701
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Drummond v. Bodiford
as 0:2026cv02954
Plaintiff: Joshua Drummond
Defendant: Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Vandersloot v. Sienna Marketing & Consulting Inc, et al.
as 4:2026cv00453
Plaintiff: Matthew Vandersloot
Defendant: Sienna Marketing & Consulting Inc and Bruno Scotti
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dentman et al v. The New Mexico Children, Youth & Families Department et al
as 2:2026cv02340
Plaintiff: Valerie Dentman and Scottie Spillman
Defendant: The New Mexico Children, Youth & Families Department, Tamara Letcher and Doe Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gladden v. hilburn et al
as 5:2026ct03212
Plaintiff: Tyrone Donte Gladden
Defendant: richie D. hilburn, Scottie Sealey and Shannon E. Maples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01823
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reeves v. Bodiford
as 0:2026cv02810
Plaintiff: Phillip Reeves and Exquire
Defendant: Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Joshua Drummond v. Scotty Bodiford
as 26-6753
Plaintiff: JOSHUA DRUMMOND
Defendant: SCOTTY BODIFORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv01769
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?