Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Holcomb et al v. Shields et al
as 5:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
James S. Holcomb, Karenkae Holcomb, Spencyr Kalberer-Ford and others
Defendant:
Douglas Shields, Sean Parks, Kirby Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sean Park v. Temple University, et al
as 19-2060
Defendant / Appellee:
AMID ISMAIL, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY and LEONA SPERAZZA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN PARK
Park v. Temple University et al
as 1:2017mc00001
Defendant:
Belinda Brown-Joseph, Jeffrey Godel, Amid Ismail and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Park
Respondent:
Temple University
Movant:
Texas State Board of Dental Examiners
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
PARK v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2016cv05025
Plaintiff:
SEAN PARK
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY , AMID ISMAIL , LEONA SPERAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez et al v. HG STAFFING, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Hillary Baker, Radd Bates, Claire Berry and others
Defendant:
HG STAFFING, LLC and MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC dba Grand Sierra Resort
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Parks v. Matagorda County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Darrien Sean Parks
Defendant:
Matagorda County Sheriff's Department, Matt Mireles, Antoine Linsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sean Park v. A'gaci, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv06867
Defendant:
A'gaci, LLC, Beyond Trends Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Park
Sean Park v. Love Culture, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02965
Defendant:
Does, Love Culture, Inc. and Michelle, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sean Park
Sean Park v. Shebah and Bethel Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01955
Defendant:
Does, Youn Suk Jang and Shebah and Bethel Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sean Park
Sean Park v. Cleo Apparel et al
as 2:2013cv09300
Defendant:
Cleo Apparel, Does and Y P Central Corporation
Plaintiff:
Sean Park
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
